Showing posts with label of. Show all posts
Showing posts with label of. Show all posts

Mariah's Not Pregnant Yet But Thinking Of Broadway

If you are thinking that Mariah Carey is hiding her pregnancy, she isn't. Honest. Sure, she was coy when she appeared on The Ellen DeGeneres Show, but now there's photographic evidence that she's not preggers.


Mariah and Nick are not expecting just yet (Photo: Reuters)


Yep, Mariah and hubby Nick Cannon were spotted on Tuesday drinking red wine and eating oysters (something you don't eat if you're expecting). It doesn't mean she's not trying of course. After all, there have been reports that she's doing light workout sessions.

In other Mariah news, the British newspapers are abuzz about the pop singer in talks to produce a Broadway stage musical about her life. And she's already decided who she'd like to play her: Leona Lewis!


Leona to play Mariah?


"Not only is she exotic, she's the only one who they reckon would be able to tackle Mariah's eight-octave vocal range," an insider told the Daily Mirror. It sure sounds like a good choice. Other names apparently being bandied about include Vanessa Hudgens and Eva Longoria.

Are you ready for Mariah Carey: The Musical?

Polanski requests dismissal of sex charge

Lawyers say new documentary reveals ‘misconduct’ in director's case



IMAGE: Roman Polanski
Abdeljalil Bounhar / AP
Filmmaker Roman Polanski, a fugitive in Europe for the last 30 years, has filed a request in Los Angeles to have a child-sex charge against him dismissed.

LOS ANGELES - Lawyers for Roman Polanski, a fugitive for 30 years in a notorious sex case involving a 13-year-old girl, filed a request Tuesday to dismiss the charge against him because of prosecutorial and judicial misconduct.

The motion alleges that a documentary about the filmmaker released this year revealed “a pattern of misconduct and improper communications” between the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office and the judge in Polanski’s case.

“This case serves as a classic example of how our justice system can be abused, and defendants’ rights trampled, by an unholy alliance between courts and criminal prosecutors,” said a statement from attorneys Chad Hummel and Brad Dalton. Dalton is the son of attorney Doug Dalton, who represented Polanski in the original case.

The Polish-born Polanski, 75, has been living in self-imposed exile in France since fleeing the United States in 1978 after pleading guilty to having sex with a 13-year-old girl in Los Angeles.

He was initially indicted on six felony counts and faced up to life in prison. Instead, he pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor and five other counts were dismissed.

Polanski, who had already been incarcerated for a psychological diagnosis for 42 days, skipped sentencing that would have sent him back to prison, and fled to France. The judge issued a warrant for his arrest that is still in effect.

The maximum sentence was 50 years, although prosecutors had said at the time that the typical sentence was 16 months to three years in prison.

Sandi Gibbons, spokeswoman for District Attorney Steve Cooley, said her office had not been served with the motion and heard about it only through media reports. She said the office could not take a position until they see the legal papers.

“We’re looking forward to seeing Mr. Polanski in Los Angeles to litigate it,” she said.

A hearing on the matter is scheduled for Jan. 21 in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

Polanski, the director of “Chinatown” and “Rosemary’s Baby,” has continued to direct films while in exile, including the 2002 Holocaust drama “The Pianist,” for which he won the best-director Academy Award.

Woman in case wants charge dropped
The woman with whom Polanski admitted having sex has said that she wants the charge dropped and that Polanski should be allowed to return to the United States.

The case was a sensation when it broke. Polanski, the widower of Manson family murder victim Sharon Tate, was arrested for having sex with the girl, whom he had hired as a model for a photo shoot. He was accused of giving her Quaaludes and champagne, taking her into a hot tub nude, and having sex with her.

The new effort to wipe out the charge comes after an HBO documentary, “Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired,” in which the man who prosecuted Polanski, retired Deputy District Attorney Roger Gunson, said that if he had been in Polanski’s position, he also would have fled the country.

The documentary also portrayed the late Superior Court Judge Laurence J. Rittenband as a publicity hound who held news conferences and engaged in extrajudicial meetings about the case.

In a legal brief, the attorneys quoted heavily from the documentary, citing statements by former Deputy District Attorney David Wells in which he acknowledged advising the judge on how to sentence the film director, even though he was not assigned to the case.

The lawyers said that Wells’ recommendation to send Polanski away for a diagnostic study was illegal without Polanski’s lawyers present. They said Wells also inflamed the judge by showing him photos depicting Polanski with girls at an Oktoberfest party in Germany while he was awaiting sentencing. They said the photos were misrepresented.

“As the result of DDA Wells’ illegal ... communications, Mr. Polanski has been subject to a punishment that has spanned the course of over 30 years,” the motion stated, noting he has been deprived of opportunities to work on films outside France.

The lawyers said the now-43-year-old victim, who never wanted Polanski to go to prison, should have the final say. They said the law requires the courts to consider a victim’s wishes.

The woman’s “wishes have remained unchanged, and this court has the discretion to finally conclude this case without any further harm” to the victim or her family, the motion stated.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


The Long Fail: the cost of digital distribution

Digital distribution as well as promotion has undoubtedly been the best thing that could have happened to music fans as well as musicians. Even bigger content owners are finally seeing the opportunities (instead of the threats) that come with the technical change of delivering 'media' over the last ten years. It is now easier than ever for artists to connect to their fans and delivering the music to them, gatekeepers have been eliminated and (in theory) artists can reach out to millions of music fans out there through the internet. So far, so good.

Everyone who works in music knows that there are various new challenges that have developed through new digital delivery methods and those challenges can make it difficult to monetize digital music. I won't be going into the issue of file sharing (there are enough people out there who have something to say about that) but I want to explore a common misunderstanding about digital media: "digital distribution is free" (or at least very cheap). It is not at the moment.

Chris Anderson's 'The Long Tail' discusses how we can monetize niche genres through very cheap distribution and how one can successfully make a business outside of the 'blockbusters' through scalable distribution methods as well as recommendations, which are enabled through digital technology. For the music industry this means that it should be easier for artists (or labels) outside the Top 100 to find their audience and sell products (downloads, CD, tickets, etc) to them by using those new technologies. This sounds all great on paper until you look at the actual cost of digital distribution. It is actually quite high.

Lets look at a simple example. I'm an artist and I want my album to be available through various download shops. My music has a niche audience but with my distinct sound and existing online following I should be able sell more music by having my album available at more retailers. If I want to do all the work myself I will have to go through the following steps:

  • Identify online retailers I want my album to be available at. And there are plenty all over the world.
  • Negotiate deals with those retailers.
  • Deliver my album in the correct specification. Those will vary from retailer to retailer.
  • Make sure I receive regular royalty reports.
  • Check those and send invoices. This will have to be repeated every month or quarter, depending on the reporting period of the retailer, and of course it has to be done for each retailer.
  • There might be some additional unexpected tasks when things go wrong: wrong meta data displayed, you never receive reports from certain retailers, some retailers might not perform well and I would like to withdraw my content, etc.

If I add up all the time I invest in the above and associate a cost to that I will quickly find out that the distribution of my album was not cheap after all. Yes, I didn't have to manufacture any CDs and there are no actual shipping costs but this does not mean it's practically free to make sure my album is available to download.

Where does this leave us? All the above makes be think of two things: a) the above doesn't always have to be like this and b) companies that control a lot of content (labels and digital aggregators) are important in the digital music ecosystem for now.

We have to make sure that digital delivery methods as well as reporting formats are standardized. Those currently create a huge workload for content owners as well as DSPs. Deals to get your music on the different platforms can also be difficult to negotiate and standard rates would make this easier for everyone. I could also go into the topic of blanket licensing for all digital music usage but this is probably something for another blog post.

In short: systems and processes will have to be built to really bring down the cost of digital distribution. Some companies already have great internal systems but we will have to work on open standards and make sure all the systems can talk to each other. The more we take out human interaction the cheaper this can become.

I give you one example of a company that has managed to build systems like the above: On Tunecore you can get your music on various retailers by paying a small flat fee. They built the infrastructure to deliver music to iTunes and get reports back without having to add much human interaction. However they cannot deliver to all DSPs but only a selection of digital download shops as well as streaming services.

There are plenty of other companies out there who are working on similar technology and it will be good to see more development in that field. If you are musician or a label today: make sure you find someone to distribute your content for you if you want your music to be available in a range of places.

Deputy pulls gun during stop of Diddy’s entourage

Hip-hop mogul Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs. — AP pic

LOS ANGELES, Aug 26 — A sheriff’s deputy pulled a gun on members of Diddy’s entourage during a routine traffic stop over the weekend, but the situation was quickly resolved and a spokesman for the entertainer said the deputy was professional and respectful.

The gun was never pointed at the hip-hop mogul, and deputies were “very respectful” during the stop early Saturday, spokesman Ed Tagliaferri said yesterday.

Diddy was travelling on Sunset Boulevard in a seven-car convoy when a deputy pulled over one of the vehicles. Combs was not in the car that was stopped for having an expired registration tag.

Sheriff’s spokesman Steve Whitmore says the deputy became concerned when several men approached the vehicle. The deputy unholstered his gun and the situation quickly cooled down.

No citations were issued because the car was a rental. — AP

Blogger arrested over leak of Guns N’ Roses songs

Axl Rose, lead singer of Guns N’ Roses. — AP pic

LOS ANGELES, Aug 28 — A blogger suspected of streaming songs from the unreleased Guns N' Roses album "Chinese Democracy" on his website was arrested yesterday and appeared in court, where his bail was set at US$10,000 (RM33,000).

FBI agents arrested 27-year-old Kevin Cogill yesterday morning on suspicion of violating federal copyright laws. Cogill appeared in court in the afternoon wearing a T-shirt; his girlfriend sat court and afterward said, "Rally the troops," but declined further comment.

Federal authorities say Cogill posted nine unreleased Guns N' Roses songs on his website in June. The songs were later removed.

In later posts, Cogill wrote that the FBI had questioned him and asked his readers if any of them knew a good attorney. He was represented yesterday by a federal public defender.

According to an arrest affidavit, Cogill admitted to agents that he posted the songs on his website. Prosecutors said the leak could result in a "significant" financial loss for the band.

Cogill will not face any special Internet restrictions, but was ordered to appear in court for a preliminary hearing on Sept 17.

"Guns N' Roses representatives have been made aware of the arrest and are leaving the matter to the authorities," said Larry Solters, the band's spokesman.

"Chinese Democracy" is a much anticipated — and repeatedly delayed — new album by Guns N' Roses that is more than 10 years in the making. At least one of the album's songs could be heard legally: The band wrote on its website in July that its track, "Shackler's Revenge" will be featured on the video game Rock Band 2, slated for release in September. — AP