‘Slumdog Millionaire’ child stars face uphill battle

MUMBAI, Feb 17 — They are not your typical movie stars.

Ten-year-old Azharuddin Mohammed Ismail lives in a lean-to made of tarpaulins and blankets. Nine-year-old Rubina Ali’s home is a tiny bubble-gum pink shack. A murky open sewer runs down her narrow lane.

Plucked from one of Mumbai’s teeming slums to star in the Oscar-nominated hit “Slumdog Millionaire,” they are India’s real slumdog millionaires.

Like the film’s hero, an impoverished tea seller who wins money and love on India’s version of “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire,” they now have a chance to escape the grinding poverty they were born into. But as their still-unfolding story shows, things never go as smoothly in real life.

The filmmakers are helping the children, but fast discovering that good intentions and deep pockets don't guarantee success. Meanwhile, sudden fame and relative fortune are sowing resentment within the families and with neighbours, who wonder why their big-eyed boys weren't cast instead.

The Fox Searchlight release has grossed more than US$100 million (RM360 million), but the children’s lives seem nearly as fragile as before.

“He’s supposed to be the hero in the movie, but look how he’s living,” said Azharuddin’s mother, Shameem Ismail, sitting on a rotting board outside their lean-to. “It’s a zero.”

About 65 million Indians, roughly a quarter of the urban population, live in slums, according to government surveys.

“Most of them are doomed to remain as they are,” said Amitabh Kundu, dean of Jawaharlal Nehru University’s School of Social Sciences in New Delhi.

It’s too early to tell whether Rubina and Azharuddin — Azhar to his friends — will buck the trend.

The filmmakers debated whether to use slum kids at all.

“Part of your brain thinks, would it distort their lives too much?” said Danny Boyle, the British director, by phone from London. “Then someone said, ‘These people have so much prejudice against them in their lives. Why should we be prejudiced against them as well?’ ”

Rubina was cast as the young Latika, who grows up to become the hero’s love interest, and Azhar as his brother, Salim.

Boyle and producer Christian Colson figured education was the best way to help Rubina and Azhar. They got them places in Aseema, a non-profit, English-language school for underprivileged kids in Mumbai.

Some arrive at Aseema with matted hair, never having seen a mirror before. Many need counseling. On one blackboard, the lesson of the day read: “I must close my mouth when I eat.”

School chairwoman Dilbur Parakh said half make it through high school, and she tries to find vocational training for the rest.

The filmmakers also paid the children for 30 days of acting work, give the families a small monthly stipend and set up trust funds that Rubina and Azhar can tap once they graduate.

Colson describes the amount in the trust as substantial, but won't tell anyone how much — not even the parents — for fear of making the kids vulnerable to exploitation.

As the movie's popularity swelled, the filmmakers’ plan began to fray.

Journalists swarmed the school, forcing Rubina and Azhar to stay home. The families started demanding more, asking for cash and new houses, Colson said.

When the city razed Azhar’s neighbourhood, Colson wired the family money for a new home. He doesn’t know what happened to the money, but the family remains camped out in a lean-to.

Most troubling, he said, the parents' commitment to seeing their kids through school has waned.

So the filmmakers have agreed to buy apartments and allow the families to move in. But they won't transfer ownership to the parents until Rubina and Azhar finish school at age 18.

The filmmakers have also faced criticism that they didn’t fairly compensate the children, but have declined to reveal how much they paid, again citing fear of exploitation.

“It’s becoming a full-time job dealing with the daily hassle,” Boyle said. Still, he added, “I’m glad we did it, even with all the headache.”

He hopes to give Rubina and Azhar an education rather than a jackpot — what he called a “slow nurturing” instead of “a sudden dash for glory.”

“Moviemaking is distorting,” Boyle said. “The last thing you want to do is turn them into a star.”

But directing movies is easier than directing lives. Stardom is already distorting Rubina’s world.

The latest additions to her family’s meagre belongings — some stainless-steel pots and old blankets — are two small photo albums.

Inside are photographs of Rubina wearing a glittering salwar kameez outfit and sitting in a helicopter, ready to fly off to a strange new world of red carpets and Bollywood heroes.

“My friends when they see me on TV say, ‘Look, you’re going to be a big actress when you grow up. You’re going to forget us’,” Rubina said. “I say, ‘You are my best friends. How can I forget you?’ “

She dashed outside and scurried along the sewer. “See this?” she said, pointing at a tract of weeds. She seemed proud to pronounce a new English word to a foreign visitor: “jungle.”

But on the narrow, dirty lanes Rubina knows best, most kids speak Hindi and Urdu and forgo school to work.

“If I wear something nice then people say how I’m trying to show off, and I normally don’t talk to them in English,” she said.

Azhar’s mum, wrapped in the sparkly pink sari she wore to the movie opening, wonders where all the money the filmmakers promised is.

“I don’t know if I should go ask them if money is coming in,” she said.

Her husband usually brings in 1,500 to 3,000 rupees (RM108 to RM216) a month selling scrap wood, but now is hospitalised with tuberculosis, Ismail said.

Azhar sat at her elbow, distracted. His friends had been staring at him as he talked with one journalist after another.

“My friends have seen me get new clothes and go in cars and get books,” he said. “Even they want that sort of life.”

He celebrated his birthday recently by buying a cake and balloons for his neighbours.

Now he wanted to buy his friends chocolate, but his mother controlled the purse strings.

Azhar began to cry. Tears ran down his small face.

“It’s my money and you are using it!” he shouted.

“We have 200 rupees,” his mother said. “I’ll give you some later.”

He kept crying, twisting his body in small unhappy thrusts. “You’re not giving me money,” he yelled. “You’re spending it on other things.”

His mother grabbed a piece of brick and raised it over her head.

“Is it your money?” he shouted, daring her: “Hit me. You hit me!”

Then he fled.

Suddenly, school, Bollywood and the upcoming Oscars all seemed terribly irrelevant. There was only the plain dirt Azhar and his mother live on, and the immediate, unruly desire for cash.

Ismail tossed the brick to the ground, rolling her one good eye in exasperation. She can't see out the other one and says she needs 6,000 rupees for an operation.

“He’s a star,” she sighed. — AP

‘The Velveteen Rabbit’, more touching than most children’s movies

NEW YORK, Feb 18 — Family and low-budget-Christian film specialist Michael Landon Jr — you-know-who’s son — lifts his game considerably in turning Margery Williams’ children’s classic “The Velveteen Rabbit” into a film. Though it flirts with maudlin here and there, and the animation is hardly state of the art, the director of “The Last Sin Eater” and “Love’s Abiding Joy” turns his loose adaptation of that story into a nice children’s tear-jerker and a generally winning combination of live action and animation.

In the America of the early 1900s, Toby (Matthew Harbour) is a boy who has lost his mother and whose sad, humourless dad (Kevin Jubinville) has dropped him off with his own icy, society matron mom (Una Kay) to live. Life with his fussy, imperious grandmother in her rural estate doesn’t hold the promise of much fun for the kid. But Dad’s injunction must be Toby’s motto — “No tears.”

At least there’s an attic to play in, and grandma’s permission to play there. That becomes Toby’s escape. And when he finds a stuffed bunny, a rocking horse and a wooden goose, the boy slips into the world his dad once knew, a room transformed by his imagination.

All it takes is a tear and the toys are transported into an animated, magical alternate setting where the bunny, the goose (voiced by Oscar winner Ellen Burstyn) and horse (Tom Skerritt, funny) chat and pass along life lessons to the boy.

“Everything that’s real was imagined first,” the rabbit (Chandler Wakefield) teaches.

Horse knows the legend of the toys that can become real if their owners believe in them fervently enough. Of course kids outgrow their toys before that belief ever magically transforms their favourite playthings. But a horse can dream. And so can a wooden goose with an eye for the metaphor at the heart of this tale.

“Love is what makes us real.”

This holiday-set “Velveteen” isn’t a literal translation of the Rabbit tale, but it hits the emotional highlights. Toby gets sick and the toys don’t know what to do; love and sacrifice play their part. The film’s odd production history — it was filmed a couple of years ago and is only opening in select cities a month before going to video — suggest that it’s been edited, and that trying to sell it with only a couple of “names” in the voice cast flummoxed its producers.

That’s a shame. This modestly mounted Rabbit is more touching than children’s movies typically are today. The live action cast may be unknowns, but they’re effective enough; the 2-D (drawn and digital) animation is winning; and the story will engross any 8-and-under with the patience to watch it.

Perhaps Landon & Co should have taken their own script’s advice and put this in more theatres.

“Just throw your heart into it and the rest will follow.” — AP

Take a look at my Facebook Profile

facebook
Syed Muhammad Amin
Syed Muhammad Amin has:
52 friends
1 photo
7 notes
5 Wall posts
4 groups

Take a look at my Facebook Profile


Hi Hitz,

I set up a Facebook Profile where I can post my pictures, videos and events and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you need to join Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own profile.

Thanks,
Syed

To join Facebook, please follow the link below:
http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=1022386481&k=36G2Y4U2WX2MYJ11WF34X&r

See who else has invited you to Facebook:
Nor Haslinda AseliNor Haslinda Aseli
26 friends
Hendry AnthonyHendry Anthony
15 friends
This email may contain promotional materials. If you do not wish to receive future commercial mailings from Facebook, please opt out. Facebook's offices are located at 156 University Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94301.

__._,_.___

Man ‘strangled wife after she called out the wrong name during sex’

LONDON, Feb 19 — A jealous husband strangled his wife after she called out another man's name during sex, a court has heard.

Colin Scully, 53, told police he throttled 39-year-old Tracey after she shouted “Paul” as they made love.

Scully suspected his wife was having an affair and claimed she had been sending explicit text messages.

He later told police that “Paul” referred to a Paul Deighton, a man they knew from a scooter club.

Scully also told officers that it “blew his mind” when his wife mentioned any other men, Leeds Crown Court heard.

James Sampson, prosecuting, said: “He knelt on her chest, causing bruising, and pinned her down crucifix style to the bed, where he strangled her using one arm.”

Tracey, who suffered from multiple sclerosis, would have taken a “significant amount of time” to die, according to a pathologist.

Scully later told police he remembered pushing his wife down on the bed before going to sleep in their children's room, the jury heard.

Police were only called the next day when he dialled 999 and said: “I've done something to my wife. I don't know what I've done.”

In his police interview, he said: “I strangled her, didn't I?”

The jury also heard from Tracey's alleged lover Paul Deighton, who became friends with the couple when they joined a scooter club in Bridlington in 2007.

He insisted that there had been no affair between them but admitted that she had sent him inappropriate text messages.

“The texts were entirely innocent at first but then changed from general conversation to a little bit more later,” he said.

“Nothing at all happened between us. My attitude was that I wasn't very happy about it at all.”

The victim's mother Wendy Wild also told the court that her daughter had confided in her that Scully liked to film her having sex with other men.

She said Tracey had claimed her husband wanted her to take their laptop with them to a Butlin's holiday the previous month.

Wild: “She told me that he wanted to get in touch with swingers. I asked her if she had done this before and she said, ‘Yes, he made me do it’.

“I said, ‘Have you both been with other people?’. She said ‘No, only me. He made me prostitute myself’.

“She was angry when she went on holiday and even angrier when she got back.”

Scully denies murder. The trial continues. — The Daily Mail

Artist Ibrahim Hussein dies

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 19 — Noted artist Datuk Ibrahim Hussein died of a heart attack at the Pantai Medical Centre here early today. He was 72.

He leaves wife Sim Hussein and daughter Alia. The funeral is expected to be held this afternoon.

The artist, popularly known as “Ib,” was widely known internationally for his abstract work. He used a medium he called “printage” — a mixture of printing and collage.

He was also founder of the Ibrahim Hussein Museum and Cultural Foundation in Langkawi.